The Day Penumbra Became Substance in New Hampshire
By Dean Dexter


Three statutes outlawing abortion dating to the 1840s have been expunged from New Hampshire law. Governor Jeanne Shaheen, a long-time abortion apologist, sealed it all with her signature in executive chambers on June 3, 1997.

The laws in question were albeit inactive due to the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, and subsequent court rulings, all of which have created a virtual right to abortion on demand in the United States for over two decades.

Contrary to the arguments of some, the dormant New Hampshire statutes did not call for sanctions against the mother. Rather the laws, encoded in 1848, addressed those who would perform abortions. Under the statutes, persons who attempted to procure a miscarriage of a pregnant woman, or who attempted to destroy a "quick child," (unless to preserve the life of the mother), faced fines of $1,000 and from one to 10 years in prison. Those who caused the death of a mother due to an abortion, would face charges of second degree murder.

Attempts previously to delete these laws failed, mostly due to either a veto or threatened veto from whoever was governor at the time. Then, with a solidly pro-abortion governor in office, along with a senate and house sympathetic to abortion, the old laws were history. Today the law is completely silent on the issue of abortion in New Hampshire. Abortion is totally unregulated in the Live Free or Die state.*

Although unenforceable, pro-life proponents in New Hampshire had long fought to keep these statutes in place. Maintaining them on the books was a cause of sorts, a statement of righteous independence -- if in name only -- from a federal judiciary that has often arrogantly over-stepped its bounds.

The issue was also just as much a cause for pro-abortionists who have been mightily irked for years at their former inability to get rid of them.

Admittedly, these statutes had no practical effect on what happened in New Hampshire abortion mills or to those who perform the grisly procedure. Yet the action was one of significance because the legislature is the voice of the people.

While federal court rulings represent the opinions and inclinations of unelected judges, state laws after all speak to the values and policies of common citizens as expressed through their elected representatives. In our kind of democratic republic, the latter is supposed to out-weigh the former, although today the courts have drawn such power unto themselves the original notion of a "weak judiciary" appears all but dead.

Today, democracy is becoming, in the words of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, a function of whatever the courts say it is.

Though your social studies teacher might have told you to the contrary, such was never meant to be in the minds of the Founding Fathers. Stated Thomas Jefferson in 1820: "The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the legislature and executive also in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch."

Those who elevate Jefferson's correspondence regarding his imagined "wall of separation" between church and state to Constitutional levels, conveniently skirt over his writings on the court's potential to become a modern-day oligarchy.

Although the Constitution is silent on the subject, Justice Harry Blackmun found a right to privacy emanating from, among other places, the penumbra -- that is the partial shadow outside of a complete shadow, as one dictionary defines the word penumbra -- of the Bill of Rights. This discovery in turn helped Blackmun construct his now well known "Constitutional right" to terminate pregnancy at will, despite laws at the time in nearly all the 50 states similar to the ones disptached in New Hampshire.

Thought: what kind of a grass-roots political job would it take to get a penumbra of something, anything, ratified by two-thirds of the states on any subject?

Nevertheless, until the governor's action, the blood of literally millions of pre-born innocents had been on the hands of Harry Blackmun -- creative legal contortionist that he was -- and that of the majority of the Court who ruled with him on that fateful day in Washington in 1973.

Yet, on a similar day, nearly a quarter of a century later, when elected representatives met in Concord to repeal what had been argued as just some old laws, a shadow born of an old man's mind spread out over the people of New Hampshire.

Now, in a way, the blood is on more hands.

Dean Dexter is a former Belknap Country Commissioner and N.H. State Representative. This article was first published in the June, July, August 1997 issue of N.H. Family Watch.

_______________

*On May 29, 2003, Governor Craig Benson signed a bill requiring parental notification before a minor undergoes an abortion in New Hampshire. Bill Will Enhance Family Rights.


 

Return to NH Commentary Home Page

© 1997-2003 NH Commentary.Com
P.O. Box 706
Concord, NH 03302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 








































Reset: 8.8.97